Just how heinous of an act would someone need to commit before you denied them redemption – or at least a second chance?
Such is the question facing professional football (NFL) fans around the country after the Philadelphia Eagles signed quarterback Michael Vick to a $1.6 million one-year deal, with an option for a second year.
Here’s a little background: Vick was the first player selected in the 2001 NFL draft, taken No. 1 overall by the Atlanta Falcons, which he quarterbacked for six seasons. At one point, he was one of the most popular and recognizable athletes in the league, not to mention its highest paid player.
But in August 2007, Vick plead guilty to felony counts of conspiracy and running a dog-fighting ring that brutally killed and tortured canines. News reports state that Vick himself killed some of the dogs by beating, drowning and electrocuting them, usually because they did not “perform” well as fighting dogs.
He served 18 months in federal prison before being released in May 2009. The NFL Commissioner subsequently ruled that he could play in the NFL again (after he essentially serves a six game suspension), and yesterday the Eagles signed him as a back-up quarterback.
Given the brutality of his crimes, football fans appear split on whether Vick should have the right to play in the NFL again.
Vick supporters say he has admitted his guilt, apologized for his actions, paid his debt to society, lost millions in sponsor endorsements, and vowed to work with the Humane Society to bring awareness to cruelty to animals. They believe he is a remorseful man who should be allowed to resume his professional career.
Other fans – many dog lovers among them – believe that playing in the NFL is a privilege and that Vick’s actions were so reprehensible that they don’t want him in the league. (Fans have already printed T-shirts that say “Hide your Beagles – Here Comes the Eagles.”) People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals released a statement criticizing the Eagles’ decision.
My opinion is mixed. I don’t think Vick should be banned from the NFL, but I don’t want him on my team.
I believe NFL players are role models for children (whether or not they want to be), and I’m uneasy with kids getting the message that you can commit violent crimes and then be put on a pedestal and paid millions of dollars. I don’t care if Vick takes a low profile job to make a living, but I don’t want him representing my team and community. Also, as a dog lover, I don’t want to root for Vick. He may or may not be remorseful, but there’s something creepy about someone who commited such violence.
Would I ban Vick from the NFL? No, I guess not – I’m not saying throw him in the electric chair. But I don’t want him wearing the teal and black of my favorite team, either.
Posted by robertpeek
I’ve packed up and changed homes more than a dozen times since graduating from college, most recently moving everything from our 3-bedroom home into a new house across town. I’ve learned a few tricks along the way to save time and headaches. Here are my top five moving tips:
Posted by robertpeek